Algerian boxer Imane Khelif, a prominent figure in the Paris Olympics boxing tournament, is taking legal action following recent reports in France that have revealed details about her medical status. French media claims that a leaked medical report categorizes Khelif as a “DSD” (Differences in Sexual Development) athlete, asserting that she should not have been eligible to compete in the women’s category at the Games. Khelif’s legal team is preparing lawsuits against individuals and media outlets involved in spreading this information, which Khelif asserts is both inaccurate and invasive.
The controversy surrounding Khelif began earlier in 2023 when she and Taiwanese boxer Lin Yu Ting were disqualified by the International Boxing Association (IBA) during the World Championships in New Delhi. The IBA, currently suspended by the International Olympic Committee (IOC), claimed both athletes failed gender tests, sparking a wave of backlash and debate over gender eligibility in sports. The IOC later intervened, allowing both athletes to compete in the Paris Olympics, arguing that the IBA’s evidence was insufficient to justify their exclusion.
This month, French journalist Djaffar Ait Aoudia published a report alleging that Khelif has an XY chromosome pattern and internal testes, which may be associated with 5-alpha reductase deficiency, a condition that affects physical development. These claims have intensified discussions around DSD athletes and eligibility criteria in women’s sports, placing Khelif at the center of a highly charged public debate.
The IOC responded to these reports through a spokesperson, stating, “We understand that Imane Khelif has taken legal action against individuals who commented on her situation during the Olympic Games Paris 2024. She is also preparing a lawsuit regarding recent media reporting. The IOC will not comment further while legal action is ongoing and will refrain from addressing unverified documents whose sources remain uncertain.”
The spokesperson emphasized that all athletes competing in the Paris 2024 boxing tournament met eligibility requirements, adding that athletes’ gender and age were determined based on passport information, as in past competitions. The IOC also expressed dismay at the intense public scrutiny and criticism Khelif has endured, calling the treatment of the athlete “unfortunate.”
Meanwhile, the IBA, long at odds with the IOC over governance and eligibility policies, quickly criticized the IOC’s handling of the situation. IBA President Umar Kremlev made a bold statement, accusing the IOC of breaking sports regulations by allowing “a man to fight a woman.” Kremlev further demanded a formal apology from IOC President Thomas Bach and his team, accusing them of compromising the integrity of women’s boxing.
The conflict between the IBA and IOC remains unresolved, leaving both organizations in a prolonged standoff. As the controversy unfolds, it has raised broader questions about how gender is assessed in competitive sports, the rights of DSD athletes, and the future of international sports regulations.
Khelif’s legal case and her decision to defend her participation in the women’s category reflect her determination to push back against what she perceives as invasive and harmful reporting. The outcomes of her lawsuits and the ongoing debate around gender eligibility will likely shape policies for future athletic competitions, highlighting the complex intersection of sports, gender identity, and fairness.
