Sunday, September 7, 2025
  • Login
Forbes 40under40
  • Home
  • Technology
  • Innovation
  • Real Estate
  • Leadership
  • Money
  • Lifestyle
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Technology
  • Innovation
  • Real Estate
  • Leadership
  • Money
  • Lifestyle
No Result
View All Result
Forbes 40under40
No Result
View All Result
Home Money

Leong: What did we learn from federal leaders’ debates? Not much

by Riah Marton
in Money
Leong: What did we learn from federal leaders’ debates? Not much
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Breadcrumb Trail Links

  1. Federal Election
  2. Opinion
  3. Columnists

Politicians’ penchant for theatre over meaningful talk didn’t start with election debates

Published Apr 21, 2025  •  Last updated 15 hours ago  •  3 minute read

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

Left to right, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, Liberal Leader Mark Carney, New Democratic Party Leader Jagmeet Singh and Bloc Quebecois Leader Yves-Francois Blanchet during the English Federal Leaders’ Debate in Montreal on April 17, 2025. Adrian Wyld/Pool/AFP via Getty Images

Article content

Live TV coverage has hampered modern political discourse.

Advertisement 2

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Calgary Sun

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account and fewer ads.
  • Get exclusive access to the Calgary Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
  • Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
  • Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Get exclusive access to the Calgary Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
  • Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
  • Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.

THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
  • Enjoy additional articles per month
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

or

Article content

Article content

Recommended Videos

Article content

Last week’s televised federal leaders’ debates serve as two more pieces of evidence supporting this.

What did anyone genuinely learn? It was more like two free-time political broadcasts — one in English and one in French — with short segments that barely qualified as real, down-to-earth debate.

It’s been like this for many election cycles: The person being questioned by the moderator or their opponent seeks not necessarily to answer the query but rather to regurgitate some tired talking point we’ve all heard before.

Even the moment during last Thursday’s English debate many pundits considered the highlight would be more aptly described as the least-boring part.

Toward the end, Liberal Leader Mark Carney attempted to score a point on Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre by asking him why he’s refused to obtain his security clearance. Poilievre gave his usual answer and deftly used the occasion to pin Carney on his inaction on interactions between some Toronto Liberal candidates and the Chinese communist party.

opening envelope

Calgary Sun Headline News

Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

Thanks for signing up!

A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Calgary Sun Headline News will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Article content

Advertisement 3

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

The exchange was entertaining but contained no news.

The only possible net new thing Canadians learned from those 240 minutes of mostly bloviation came during the French debate last Wednesday, when the moderator asked what habit the party leaders had given up in response to the U.S. President Donald Trump’s trade war.

Some of their disdain for tasteless, flavourless U.S. strawberries was the only correct answer. (And I say “possible net new thing” because this strawberry businesses started as a jab at an awkward response Carney gave during an earlier TV interview in French.)

Politicians’ penchant for theatre over meaningful talk didn’t start with election debates, though.

PIerre Poilievre Mark Carney
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, left, and Liberal Leader Mark Carney participate in the English-language federal leaders’ debate in Montreal on Thursday, April 17, 2025. Adrian Wyld/Pool/The Canadian Press

Politicians forever going after the perfect sound bite

I’ve pretty much given up on question period, for example.

What’s meant to be time for federal and provincial parliamentarians to quiz the government has become a vehicle for the creation of a good sound bite or video clip.

Advertisement 4

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Alternatively, the government evades the queries, rendering question period useless.

(And don’t get me started on the heckling. Shame.)

Would the overtly political parts of our assemblies work better without cameras, so our representatives wouldn’t feel the need to show off?

At least question period and leaders’ debates offer a chance at rebuttal, however slim.

The worst type of live coverage would be that of a politician making a speech or an announcement at a news conference.

Whoever’s talking gets free reign to say whatever they want, unchallenged to start.

There’s not necessarily time for a thorough fact check on the spot — and often, when knowledgeable journalists try to question this claim or that, they’re treated as hostile individuals.

By the time the media has had time to go through everything with a fine-tooth comb, it’s very possible the news consumer has already absorbed what they think is fact and turned it all off.

Advertisement 5

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

There’s no doubt live pictures, however they’re delivered, are a powerful means of delivering news.

People of a certain age will remember the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks playing out before their eyes during TV morning shows.

Those who’ve been around even longer will remember fuzzy video of a lone demonstrator facing off against tanks in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989.

Late on March 10, 2011, the handful of us working the late-night shift in the newsroom watched slack-jawed as cable news showed the Pacific Ocean swallowing a large swath of coastal Japan near Fukushima after a massive earthquake and tsunami.

Live video can bring a different dimension to journalism when it comes to things like natural disasters, civil unrest, crime and terrorism, allowing everyone to follow evolving information about what is happening at any given moment.

Live coverage of political arguments and government announcements can’t always elevate public knowledge and discourse in the same way — in fact, it may have done us a great disservice by giving the last word to whoever speaks first or flamboyantly, not necessarily whoever speaks earnestly and truthfully.

rleong@postmedia.com

Find Ricky on Bluesky and on X

Recommended from Editorial

Article content

Share this article in your social network

Tags: debatesFederalLeadersLearnLeong
Riah Marton

Riah Marton

I'm Riah Marton, a dynamic journalist for Forbes40under40. I specialize in profiling emerging leaders and innovators, bringing their stories to life with compelling storytelling and keen analysis. I am dedicated to spotlighting tomorrow's influential figures.

Next Post
Greenback slides as Fed independence under threat from Trump

Greenback slides as Fed independence under threat from Trump

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Forbes 40under40 stands as a distinguished platform revered for its commitment to honoring and applauding the remarkable achievements of exceptional individuals who have yet to reach the age of 40. This esteemed initiative serves as a beacon of inspiration, spotlighting trailblazers across various industries and domains, showcasing their innovation, leadership, and impact on a global scale.

 
 
 
 

NEWS

  • Forbes Magazine
  • Technology
  • Innovation
  • Money
  • Leadership
  • Real Estate
  • Lifestyle
Instagram Facebook Youtube

© 2025 Forbes 40under40. All Rights Reserved.

  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Technology
  • Innovation
  • Real Estate
  • Leadership
  • Money
  • Lifestyle

© 2024 Forbes 40under40. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In