BMW has joined Chinese producers in filing a challenge at the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) against EU tariffs on China-made electric vehicles (EVs), according to a filing on the court’s website.
The court document showed the German automaker lodged its complaints at the General Court, the lower of two CJEU chambers, on Jan 21, a day before the deadline for filing challenges. Proceedings at the General Court last on average 18 months and can be appealed.
Chinese electric vehicle makers BYD, Geely and SAIC have also challenged the EU’s import tariffs at the court.
The EU imposed tariffs on China-made EVs at the end of October after an anti-subsidy investigation, including 17 per cent for BYD, 18.8 per cent for Geely and 35.3 per cent for SAIC, on top of the EU’s standard car import duty of 10 per cent. The rate for BMW, which manufactures the electric Mini Cooper and electric Mini Aceman in China, is 20.7 per cent.
No further details of the cases were given.
The China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products (CCCME), an industry body that has represented Chinese EV producers, also filed a complaint on Jan 22, the Chinese Chamber of Commerce to the EU (CCCEU) said.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
The CCCEU urged Beijing and Brussels to negotiate a compromise to avoid tariffs. The two have been in talks about possible minimum price commitments since September.
In a statement on Friday (Jan 24), the CCCME confirmed its action on behalf of “authorised companies” and pledged to “continue to represent China’s EV industry through judicial litigation and resolutely defend the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese EV companies.”
The European Commission said it was aware of the cases and had two months and 10 days to prepare its defence, adding that technical contact with Beijing was continuing.
The challenges are likely to include arguments over the assessment of subsidies, the establishment of injury to EU industry and the Commission’s unusual decision to launch a case on its own, rather than following an industry complaint.
SAIC is expected to take issue with its far higher tariff. This followed a determination that it did not cooperate with the investigation, allowing the Commission to fill in missing sections with selected available facts.
China-based EV makers have also complained that Tesla, the largest exporter of EVs from China into the EU, was not included in the official sample, from which the rate for other companies is calculated. The sampled companies were BYD, Geely and SAIC.
Tesla secured the lowest extra tariff of 7.8 per cent. If it had been part of the sample, cooperating companies would have benefited from a lower tariff than the 20.7 per cent they now face. REUTERS
